I've never been able to figure out what exactly is wrong with being an elitist snob. I've enjoyed every moment of it. And I appreciate other elitist snobs who know more about certain subjects than I do (Science, Mathematics, et al) and grant them their elitist perch high atop the font of knowledge, looking forward to the erudite theories and illuminations that will fall from their lips. I don't begrudge them their knowledge. So, I've never really understood the view that some republicans have that knowing a whole bunch and informing others of your studies is this bad thing.
Obama has not done as well with uneducated people. Shouldn't this be a light-bulb moment? Shouldn't we all say, "hmm, I think I'll hang my hat on that Obama fella because people who aren't educated beyond the 12th grade don't seem to like him much!"
And just what are Hollywood values? Sappy, smarmy, everything-turns-out-ok-in-the-end views of life? The Brokeback Mountains are pretty few and far between. If the artistic value of that film were matched regularly by most Hollywood fare instead of the schlock that so often fills the billboard of my local Loew's Cineplex, we'd be going to the movies a whole lot more than we do.
But this is the one that really gets me. Conservatives, it seems, are happier than Liberals: http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20080507/sc_livescience/conservativeshappierthanliberals;_ylt=ApQOWUbSRW7e6eDExGg3wYADW7oF
And apparently this is true because Liberals are less able to rationalize away the notion that some of us are having a hard time in this life. We tend to see the inequities and are BOTHERED by them whereas many Conservatives rationalize that people who are sick, cold, hungry and poor really deserve their fate. It's sort of the devilish version of The Secret.
What's so funny really, is that I absolutely dislike most people and think that, by virtue of the fact that I am smarter than 90% of the population, I am just a little bit better. And yet, I cannot rationalize away the very un-level playing fields that I see in the world... It's a puzzlement.
May is Foster Care Month.
I first became cognizant of our flawed foster care systems during my years in the Junior League of Seattle. Improving the lives of children in foster care is compelling but it's difficult for people to think of children suffering and, I think, even more difficult to think that it's going on right under your nose.
One of the big issues facing children in foster care is emancipation. These are children who reach the age of 18 while in the foster system and who have not been adopted. They 'age out' of the system and are emancipated at 18 to start their own lives. But think of it, what do they carry with them into the future?
'The Child Welfare League of America reports that as many as 36 percent of foster youth who have aged out of the system become homeless, 56 percent become unemployed, 27 percent of male former foster youth become jailed. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that less than half of emancipated youth who have aged out graduate from high school, compared to 85 percent of all 18-to-24-year-olds; fewer than 1 in 8 graduate from a four-year college; two-thirds had not maintained employment for a year; fewer than 1 in 5 was completely self-supporting; more than a quarter of the males spent time in jail; and four of 10 had become parents as a result of an unplanned pregnancy.' (wikipedia)
Casey Family Programs and the Annie E. Casey Foundation work to improve the lives of children in foster care. And there are lots of things we can do - easy things - particularly for foster kids who are heading to college this May or June. http://orphan.org/index.php?id=27
I am recommending to our outreach board that we write letters to be included in care packages for new college freshmen moving from foster care to college. What tenacity to get through that system and actually head off to college.